It sounds fairly straightforward. So to measure trustworthiness, I'm going to guess we're going to need a preview of some previous decision making with their clients' money. Admittedly, the stock market hasn't ever been something I explored. So I imagine knowing success of previous people they've worked with has some value.
[ To say he has't explored is as good as saying he has no idea. Rohan is historically bad with money, and notorious for just using it on frivolous things. He owned a large house for himself, and a lot of novelties from pop culture. SO this is unheard of for him . And while he's done much better with his pursuits here than he had been doing when he first arrived, it can always be better. ]
Finding someone who isn't a criminal should be the easiest part of it - the rest could take a little bit of time depending on how many you have.
[ Good thing she can see...his stand. It might take some time to evaluate them individually, but it's going to be faster than having conversations. ]
no subject
[ To say he has't explored is as good as saying he has no idea. Rohan is historically bad with money, and notorious for just using it on frivolous things. He owned a large house for himself, and a lot of novelties from pop culture. SO this is unheard of for him . And while he's done much better with his pursuits here than he had been doing when he first arrived, it can always be better. ]
Finding someone who isn't a criminal should be the easiest part of it - the rest could take a little bit of time depending on how many you have.
[ Good thing she can see...his stand. It might take some time to evaluate them individually, but it's going to be faster than having conversations. ]